Construction — Build, Appearance, Size (continued)

The X300 is intentionally designed with a small size in mind, so we weren't too surprised at the front of the system. Sound can still be heard well enough from the system speakers, though a bit muffled since the front of the system is angled down a bit. The LEDs can also be seen slightly, but for the most part, only when looking dead on or at an angle.

Click to enlarge.


The left side of the X300 reveals more functionality. First up are the system's secure digital and a PCMCIA slot. Personally, we prefer the hanging door to the dummy PCMCIA card. It was a bit unexpected for us to see a secure digital slot on the X300, though Dell's handhelds implement it.

Next up are the audio jacks: headphone out and microphone in. The absence of line out is due to the redundancy that headphone out and line out bring together. We are glad to see the X300 come with firewire support; in this case, a 4-pin IEEE-1394 firewire port. As we have mentioned before, we would have forgiven the absence of one as a result of the system's small size.

Left of the firewire port is a USB 2.0 port and above it a “D/Bay” connector. While the “D/Bay” connector looks similar to a USB 2.0 connector, it is actually used to power external modular devices produced by Dell, such as an external DVD-ROM drive. The power rail is necessary to prevent power hungry external devices (like that DVD drive) from requiring a wall plug while operating. Also on the right side are the power in port, ethernet jack, and modem jack. As mentioned previously, Dell has finally strayed away from keyed power plugs on previous notebooks (Latitude and Inspiron) lines in favor of a circular plug which can be inserted in any direction.


Click to enlarge.


The back of the system is actually barer than the front, which is something we don't often see. The only things on the back are the battery and a lock port to the far right.


Click to enlarge.


On the right side, the X300 is home to the VGA-out port, which is usually on the back. This placement does limit the orientation of the system in relation to the external monitor. An additional USB 2.0 port is also on the right side, as well as an IR window and the system's exhaust vent. There is no actual intake vent, as air is drawn in through the various system crevices specifically the ports.


Click to enlarge.


The bottom of the X300 reveals the system's 14.8V 1.9AH Lithium Ion battery along with an access panel. The access panel in the middle of the system is home to the unit's single SODIMM slot, mini-PCI slot, and the modem. Behind the access panel is the docking station port, which is covered while not in use by two springed doors. The metal housing the docking port and at the back of the system are used as additional electrical connectors for the docking station, likely acting as grounds.


 

 

 

Click to enlarge.

 

Click to enlarge.


The Dell Latitude X300 fits nicely in the ultraportable class, measuring in at 10.8" x 9.2" and 0.9" thick. Our X300 weighs in at 2.9 pounds, much lighter than the Inspiron 8600 and noticeably less than the IBM ThinkPad X31.

Construction - Build, Appearance, Size Construction - Under the Hood
Comments Locked

6 Comments

View All Comments

  • DL2 - Saturday, March 20, 2004 - link

    I currently have an x300. I travel a great deal and have had a problem with a spot appearing on the screen. I have already had the screen replaced once and soon to be again. My question is would the IBM x31 be more durable than the Dell 300? I have not been able to find a x31 to compare to.

  • Shalmanese - Saturday, November 1, 2003 - link

    When anyone says Centrino, the basically mean the Pentium-M. Its just that Centrino is the more recognisable brand name. Technically, half the machines out there aren't real Centrinos since they use a 3rd party 802.11a/b/g chip.

    And I wasn't saying that the R50p was comparable to the X300, I just wanted it on the waiting list for reviews. IBM haven't had a serious Desktop replacement machine since the A31p over a year ago. (The G series doesn't count due to its sucky onboard graphics). It should be interesting what it brings to the table.
  • RichieZ - Saturday, November 1, 2003 - link

    "BTW, the T40 isn't all that much bigger than the X31.... I like mine :)"

    Um the T40 is quite a bit bigger than the X31, I had a T40 at work and have an X31 as my personal machine.

    Isn't this X300 acutally made by samsung?
  • Randalmaker - Saturday, November 1, 2003 - link

    "Centrino technology continues to breathe a breath of fresh air into the market with a marriage of performance and portability."...omg stop this blue-eyed intelback-scratchin plz. we all know that the real innovation here is the banias only and that intel is using their marketing power and money 2 wipe out its mainboard competition once more. i shouldnt have 2 tell u that. centrino is a joke but it worx
  • Souka - Friday, October 31, 2003 - link

    R50p is a "monster" in size compared to these ultra-portables.... review, yes...comparable, no.

    anyways....yeah, the X31 rulz....more expensive, but going cheap on laptops is often not worth it. BTW, the T40 isn't all that much bigger than the X31.... I like mine :)


  • Shalmanese - Thursday, October 30, 2003 - link

    "The X31 rains supreme in the battery life department."...

    Anyway, the feature set looks a lot like the Sony ultra-portables, right down to the blocking of the VGA port when you stick the media bay on.

    quick request: would it be possible for you to review the IBM R50p when it comes out? Exected release date is november some time. Thanks

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now