Gateway M-152XL - Overview

The last laptop in this roundup comes from Gateway, so in a sense Acer is represented twice. However, the M-152XL couldn't be more different from the Acer 6920G. Like the AVADirect IFL90, the M-152XL is also no longer in production, but the new M-153XL is identical in design and only differs by including a few upgrades. The upgrades don't really affect performance, so what we have to say about the M-152XL applies equally to the M-153XL.

The M-152XL is a very traditional laptop design, but a few minor changes improve the look. The M-152XL comes in three colors: pacific blue (our test unit), garnet red, or arctic bloom (light blue). It's a minor difference, but if we were to judge purely on the external appearance we'd rank the M-152XL as the "winner" of this roundup. Opinions on what looks nice will of course differ from person to person, so while we like the appearance there's plenty more to examine. Another interesting difference is that Gateway uses a slot-load DVDR instead of a traditional tray, but here we'd prefer to have a standard DVDR. For one, the slot-load drive is extremely noisy whenever you load/eject a disc, and the extra moving parts are one more point of failure. The other drawback is that if your drive ever fails (or if you want to upgrade to a Blu-ray drive in the future), it's going to be very difficult to find other slot-load options.

Delving into the internals, the M-152XL is also similar to the Gateway P-7811 in terms of assembly. You can access two compartments on the bottom, with one housing the mini PCI expansion slots and hard drive and the other containing the SO-DIMMs, CPU, GPU, and cooling system. There's really no reason to continue dismantling the laptop, short of replacing the motherboard, since you can get at all of the user-upgradeable components. Also note that the GPU (and GPU RAM) are soldered onto the motherboard, so there's zero chance of upgrading the GPU (which is only slightly lower than the 0.01% chance that someone will make a compatible MXM module for the other laptops during their lifetime). The M-152XL is also the only laptop we've tested in recent history to feature an ATI GPU, which is one of the reasons we wanted to get a test unit. Ideally, we'd like to get some laptops with the ATI and NVIDIA IGP solutions to test, as well as some of the newer 3000 series ATI parts, but so far we have not been successful in that endeavor.

AVADirect IFL90 – Thoughts and Summary Gateway M-152XL – Features and Specifications
Comments Locked

26 Comments

View All Comments

  • JarredWalton - Wednesday, September 17, 2008 - link

    The same way as in http://www.anandtech.com/mobile/showdoc.aspx?i=339...">previous articles, which is to say we ran the built-in test. It may not represent actual gameplay 100%, but that's not really possible with any benchmark of any game, since specific scenes/levels are always slower for faster. The idea is to show the relative performance of the laptops. If memory serves, the built-in performance test usually provided higher numbers than regular gameplay by 10-20%.
  • bob4432 - Wednesday, September 17, 2008 - link

    did you have to unlock anything? the reason i ask is because when i run the benchmark test i get 63fps avg from an x1800xt to a 4850 to a 8800gtx to a 9800gtx @ 1280x1024 - 1680x105....rigs have 2-3GB of ram and are running from x2 4200s to e2160@3Ghz to a quad rig
  • JarredWalton - Wednesday, September 17, 2008 - link

    You need to add the -novsync option to the command line argument.
  • bob4432 - Wednesday, September 17, 2008 - link

    command line?
  • JarredWalton - Wednesday, September 17, 2008 - link

    You'll need to manually create a shortcut to the game executable (RelicCOH.exe). Then right-click on the shortcut and choose properties. In the Shortcut tab, under target, add -novsync at the end of the line (after any quotes or other stuff). The 1.70 patch enabled VSYNC by default to provide a higher quality rendering experience, and the Readme file details the above command-line parameter.
  • bob4432 - Thursday, September 18, 2008 - link

    thanks for the info - ended up w/ 106fps avg w/ a decent o/c'd 4850, e2160@3GHz and 3GB ddr2-667, so i am happy w/ that. pretty impressed w/ that 7811fx machine. thinking of myself moving up to a 24" 1920x1200 lcd here in a couple days and figure that my next rig will be crossfire since i will probably need it but not too shabby for the price i paid for this current gpu. only thing is the damn heat output :)

    again, thanks

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now